Follow us:

Brier Dudley's blog

Brier Dudley offers a critical look at technology and business issues affecting the Northwest.

May 2, 2006 at 5:53 PM

Fun with Microsoft code names

Microsofties are doing that self-critical thing over code names, specifically cool code names that never make it onto final products. It began with a post by software design test engineer Chris Smith, who was commenting on Nintendo’s decision to change its new console’s name from “Revolution” to “Wii”:

Before I act too harshly on Nintendo for having a cooler codename than product name, here is a list of Microsoft codenames which would make for some pretty interesting products:

Bulletproof – Microsoft mail remote client

“The” Duke – Microsoft Xbox controller

Gandalf – Microsoft Encarta 93

Idaho – An early Windows prototype after XP (I’m from Idaho, so it’s cool 🙂

Nemesis – Microsoft Windows Media Encoder 7.0

Omega – An early version of Microsoft Access

Tarantula – Microsoft personal web server (IIS for Windows 95)

Thunder – Microsoft Visual Basic v1.0

Zamboni – Microsoft Visual C++ v4.1

Smith’s posting was picked up by Robert Scoble, who drew an interesting response this afternoon from Microsoft naming czar David Webster.

Webster said he’s not trying to be the “fun police,” but the company has to be really careful with names. His comment suggests that code naming could eventually be phased out.

My first and primary point is that we should be creating our real product names much sooner, thus reducing the need for codenames in the first place. The equity built in codenames is generally wasted. Buzz is built, communities develop, attachments form and then we switch the name to something new. This isn’t a good thing.

So my main pitch to marketers across Microsoft is to drive naming timelines from disclosure dates, not RTM dates as has been the practice. If they do this early enough, no code name needed.

That would draw a hailstorm of protest, from journalists, at least.

Comments | Topics: Microsoft

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►