Follow us:

Brier Dudley's blog

Brier Dudley offers a critical look at technology and business issues affecting the Northwest.

June 23, 2006 at 11:33 AM

Merrill Lynch: Microsoft should buy Yahoo!?

First Wall Street flipped out when Microsoft decided to spend a billion or so fighting Google. Now one analyst is saying Microsoft should spend $44 billion buying Yahoo! or perhaps eBay.

Merrill Lynch analyst Justin Post pushed the Yahoo! acquisition in a research note this morning that contributed to YHOO’s 2.4 percent gain today.

Yahoo! plus MSN still wouldn’t equal Google’s market share. But MSN plus eBay’s Skype would help Microsoft grab the nascent VoIP market that seems more important than the current Internet advertising bubble. Post doesn’t talk much about eBay and instead runs with the idea that ad sales could eclipse Windows.

“Microsoft’s goal is to make advertising a significant new revenue stream — possibly even larger than the

core operating system business (per recent quote from MSN executive in

Mediapost.com),” he wrote. “A potential acquisition would significantly accelerate

Microsoft’s efforts in search. A Yahoo!/MSN-Microsoft combination would

have garnered approximately 41% share in the U.S. of search queries and

29% worldwide in April versus Google with 44% and 61% share, respectively.”

Here’s the meat of Post’s note:

Trends support increasing acquisition probability

Following on recent press speculation on Microsoft Internet acquisition strategy,

we consider that continued query share gains by Google, a growing Internet focus

from Microsoft and pressure on large cap. Internet valuations (down 20%+

YTD) support Microsoft’s opportunity to make a large cap. Internet acquisition.

While Microsoft is likely to wait on an acquisition until the company can evaluate

results of their a “go-big” investment in their MSN search platform, Google’s

ongoing traffic share gains and greater focus on building a software platform

(recent spreadsheet launch and Adobe partnership) increase acquisition

probability, in our view. We think takeout valuation analysis could begin to

support eBay and Yahoo! stock valuations.

Weighing acquisitions versus buybacks

Microsoft’s $34bn cash balance and roughly $12bn/year cash generation argues

for more aggressive share buybacks and/or higher dividend yield from a financial

perspective. However, the possible acquisition of Yahoo! would be a strategic

positive, in our view. Although likely dilutive to EPS by up to $0.05 in C07E

(excluding deal related amortization), we think the strategic value of a deal would

far outweigh dilution. A potential acquisition of Yahoo! would reduce the risks and

the time horizon for Microsoft to drive market share and profitability of its MSN

business unit relative to its internal efforts.

Can Microsoft afford not to take the risk?

Worst case, an acquisition of eBay (C-1-9) or Yahoo! (C-2-9) could cost Microsoft

$5/share if completely unsuccessful (we could argue increasing Internet

investment spending has already impacted MSFT stock by $3-5/share); however,

Google’s potential encroachment on Microsoft’s core software market, using

Internet profitability to fund software investment, represents a long-term business

risk. An acquisition could instantly vault Microsoft to the leading revenue position

on the Internet.

Acquisition economics = potential Yahoo! valuation support

Based on acquisition premiums ranging from 30-47%, our analysis suggests that

Microsoft can acquire Yahoo! (from $40-45/share) using cash and debt as

acquisition currencies and suffer minimal EPS dilution ($0.01-0.04). We estimate

the same range of dilution for an eBay acquisition, although acquisition would

have less strategic benefits, in our view. Yahoo! seems a better strategic fit

based on: 1) Microsoft’s search/advertising focus across the PC, mobile devices

and video game consoles, 2) natural ad platform and cost synergies and 3)

elimination of a top competitor.

Comments | Topics: Google, Microsoft, Web

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►