Follow us:

Education Lab Blog

Education Lab is a yearlong project to spark meaningful conversations about education solutions in the Pacific Northwest.

June 19, 2014 at 5:32 PM

Guest: Fightin’ words from the state Supreme Court on education

“It is the paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders…” — Article IX, Section I, Washington State Constitution

Chris Korsmo is CEO of the League of Education Voters, a statewide nonprofit.

Chris Korsmo is CEO of the League of Education Voters, a statewide nonprofit.

Last week the state Supreme Court ordered the Legislature to appear before the court in early September and explain its reasons for failing to make adequate progress in the McCleary v. State of Washington funding case.

Two years ago, the justices found that the state was violating its constitutional obligation to amply fund basic education in the McCleary case. Lawmakers were given a 2018 deadline to fix how we fund K-12 schools.

With last week’s ruling, it appears that the court and the Legislature are headed for a legal and political showdown.

According to the court’s order, “…The State is hereby summoned to appear before the Supreme Court to address why the State should not be held in contempt for violation of this Court’s order…” and laid out seven possible sanctions that could be imposed, including fines, ordering the sale of state property and invalidating the entire state budget.

Whoa. Them’s fightin’ words.

And while the justices and legislators slug it out over who has the power to do what to whom, Washington state’s 10-year achievement gap continues to grow in all grade levels in reading and math.

So I have to ask: What about the kids? Who is fighting for them?

At the League of Education Voters, we support an ample, equitable, stable education funding plan. While we supported the re-definition of “basic education” developed in 2009 (it includes smaller class size, full-day kindergarten, transportation, materials and supplies) upon which McCleary is based, we advocated that the definition should also include early learning and higher education.

During the past two years, we have grown increasingly uncomfortable with the current definition of basic education. It is neither ample nor equitable. And thanks to our over-reliance on local levies, it certainly isn’t stable.

We need a definition of basic education that puts students and their learning at the center.

A definition that encompasses the entire continuum of education, from early learning through higher education. A definition that recognizes that kids aren’t widgets and that learning doesn’t happen in a vacuum. A definition that embraces high standards for all. A definition that recognizes that students who need more support to reach high standards should get more support.

So what if instead the definition of basic education guaranteed that every Washington student receives high-quality early learning and attends preschool and full-day kindergarten?

What if the definition guaranteed every Washington student could read by third grade?

What if the definition guaranteed every Washington student graduated high school with a meaningful high school diploma that prepared her for college and the workforce?

What if the definition guaranteed each student access to affordable higher education, be it a two-year, four-year or technical degree?

What if the definition guaranteed the quality of a student’s education was not determined by his or her ZIP code?

We can do this. We must do this. Let’s do what works for kids.

That’s a definition of basic education that’s worth fighting for.

Chris Korsmo is CEO of the League of Education Voters, a statewide nonprofit organization.

Comments | More in Guest opinion, Opinion | Topics: education funding, McCleary decision, Washington state legislature

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►