Follow us:

Jon Talton

Analysis and commentary on economic news, trends and issues, with an emphasis on Seattle and the Northwest.

January 9, 2012 at 10:05 AM

Why we need a consumer protection bureau

More than 500 readers voted in Friday’s poll about whether we need the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, one of the few meaningful reforms to come out of the bubble and crash fueled by Wall Street fraud. Nearly 73 percent said we did, even though congressional Republicans have been blocking President Obama’s choice to lead the agency and have expressed hostility to the CFPB even existing.

Fresh evidence for its need came with the Sunday column by the New York Times’ Gretchen Morgenson. She details the suit by Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto against Lender Processing Services, the giant foreclosure and default outfit that works for major banks:

With this case, she demonstrated how enlightening an in-depth study can be. The complaint, which came after a 14-month inquiry, contends that L.P.S. deceived consumers by committing widespread document execution fraud, misrepresenting its fees and making deceptive statements about its efforts to correct paperwork. Investigators interviewed former L.P.S. employees and customers and examined foreclosures the company had worked on.

This is just the tip of a very large iceberg involving shady practices in mortgages, student loans, payday loans, etc. The argument that the industry is self-regulating is not worth our time: The post-deregulation disaster that precipitated the Great Recession shows this is not true.

Other concerns about the agency merit debate. With so many federal laws already on the books, do we need yet another federal bureaucracy generating yet more compliance red tape, which will eventually be paid for by customers? Apparently we do considering how many times existing agencies said they lacked the standing to go after these bad actors. Could new rules have merely given this power to the Federal Reserve, FDIC SEC, or Federal Trade Commission? Perhaps. A larger concern is whether in the future the new bureau will be captured by the industry, as happened with other regulators during the bubble. And will Congress even provide adequate funding?

Now we’ll see if the captured Congress also tries to intervene to stop state attorneys general from going after the bad guys.

And Don’t Miss: Unemployment scars to last years, if not generations || Wall Street Journal

Today’s Econ Haiku:

A Greek comedy

Athens spending bailout funds

On Euro arms deals

(Tragedy requires nobility on the part of the protagonists).

Comments | More in Banking, Consumer protection, Housing


No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.

The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►