Follow us:

Jon Talton

Analysis and commentary on economic news, trends and issues, with an emphasis on Seattle and the Northwest.

Category: Inequality
April 24, 2014 at 10:11 AM

UW event will take deeper look at inequality

The Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies at the University of Washington will host an event Friday that will take an in-depth look at rising inequality. It is aimed at connecting major scholars with activists, but promises to offer plenty of perspective for the general public. Professor George Lovell said, “We aim to take a step…

More

0 Comments | More in Inequality

December 5, 2013 at 10:19 AM

Tackling inequality: Easier said than done

The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein is surely correct in writing that Wednesday President Obama gave “perhaps the best single economic speech of his presidency.” The president said, “I believe this is the defining challenge of our time:  Making sure our economy works for every working American.”

But changing the trajectory of policy and change that has caused the worst inequality since the Gilded Age is a different matter.

Technology has played a role, at the very least in widening the rewards the market gives different actors, in making it even harder on people with only a high-school education or less. Many anti-immigration critics say this is a big problem, and there is some truth to this inasmuch as immigration has been at very high levels over the past 20 years.

But policy is responsible for most of the problem.

Policy made it easier to bust unions and more difficult for workers to unionize. Court decisions have tilted the balance away from worker rights and protections.

More

0 Comments | More in Inequality

December 2, 2013 at 10:42 AM

Wages, debt drag on holiday sales

It is too early to know how the holiday retail season turns out, but some early indicators are not good. According to the National Retail Federation, sales through the entire Black Friday weekend actually declined by 3.9 percent compared with the same period last year.

The data will be noisy until after the first of next year, but some metrics are clear.

The average American family makes less, adjusted for inflation, than it did in 1989. Although productivity has risen, wages have largely stagnated. Nearly 40 percent of workers made less than $20,000 in 2012Older workers are increasingly left to work in the low-wage fast-food sector.

The lowest-income households have barely seen any growth in recent decades. Economic mobility, once a cornerstone of a growing middle class, has become more difficult. Even before the devastating Great Recession, the top 1 percent (and the top one-hundredth of 1 percent) had seen their share of income skyrocket.

More

0 Comments | More in Inequality, Retail

November 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM

The recession and its aftermath: Bad baked in the cake

If you haven’t already read the wonkishly titled Aggregate Supply in the United States: Recent Developments and Implications for the Conduct of Monetary Policy, it is definitely worth your time.

Written by David Wilcox, the head of research at the Federal Reserve, and two other Fed economists, this paper argues that the Great Recession and the years of weak recovery have done long-term damage to the American economy.

It’s not just sustained high unemployment, weak output and continued stagnant wages. The consequences are a negative feedback loop of lost productive capacity. They use the term “hysteresis” to describe the phenomenon, in this case the ecosystem of the economy being dependent on past conditions, not merely those of the present.

Most important, their research shows that the crisis and its aftermath “shaved” almost 7 percent off potential output based on the trend up to 2006. That’s almost $1.2 trillion.

More

0 Comments | More in Great reset, Inequality

November 6, 2013 at 10:45 AM

Minimum wage: Today SeaTac, tomorrow the nation?

Well, no. If the trend holds and SeaTac voters approve a $15-per-hour minimum wage, it will be very hard to translate this victory into a national movement.

SeaTac is a tiny municipality with only 12,000 registered voters. It has a large number of low-wage restaurant and hotel businesses that are captive to their proximity to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. They will have little choice but to pay the new wage.

For that same reason, SeaTac won’t likely be a useful laboratory to examine the unintended consequences that critics warned about, or the benefits that supporters claim.

Enacting the wage in a city such as Seattle would be much more difficult, even though Mayor-elect Ed Murray has paid lip service to it. Business community resistance would be fierce and potent. And businesses would have more options: Move, close, cut back hours and refuse to hire the least-skilled workers.

More

0 Comments | More in Inequality, Jobs/Unemployment | Topics: minimum wage, SeaTac vote

September 17, 2013 at 11:13 AM

For most Americans, no recovery in ’12

The Census Bureau reported today that median household income was essentially stagnant last year,  at $51,017. Adjusted for inflation, that leaves income 8.3 percent lower than where it stood in 2007 before the recession. The poverty rate was 15 percent, with 46.5 million of our fellow citizens living at or below the official poverty line. That’s 2.5 percentage points higher than in 2007 and close to a post-War on Poverty record. Of this, 43 percent were in “deep poverty,” with half below the poverty line. In 2000, the rate of poverty was 11.3 percent. In the late 1950s, before LBJ’s War on Poverty began, the rate was above 22 percent.

The Gini ratio, which measures income inequality was basically unchanged at 0.477. Still, it is at a record high. In the late 1960s, it stood around 0.39. As was reported recently, the top 1 percent made up all their losses from the downturn and have accumulated a record share of national income.

Breaking down the numbers reveals a grim picture of not just stagnation, but in many cases a retrograde move. The typical American family makes less than it did in 1989.

More

0 Comments | More in Income/living standards, Inequality, Poverty | Topics: Income, inequality, poverty

August 28, 2013 at 10:32 AM

Fifty years later, the march remains unfinished

This aerial view shows crowds at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington during Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have A Dream" speech on Aug. 28, 1963. (Associated Press photo)

This aerial view shows crowds at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington during Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have A Dream” speech on Aug. 28, 1963. (Associated Press photo)

The seminal event that took place 50 years ago was officially called The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. The progress since then is undeniable: No more “colored-only” facilities, no more de jure segregation of Jim Crow. The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965, with essential Republican support — although that is now being eroded. We are far from Dr. King’s dream but we are a different country and, in matters of racial equality, a better one. The “jobs” part of the march is a different matter. The marchers advocated “jobs for all,” in addition to decent housing, good and integrated education and a minimum wage that would be $13 in today’s dollars.

In July, the unemployment rate for African-Americans was 13.4 percent vs. 6.8 percent for whites. That’s July 2013. For Hispanics, it was 9.5 percent. For African-Americans age 16 to 19, it was a staggering 41.6 percent compared with 20.3 percent for whites. Ground has been lost since 2000, when the black unemployment rate had fallen to 7.6 percent from 13 percent in 1993. According to the Census Bureau, median income for black males was $23,584 in 2011; for black females it was $19.561. Both were down substantially from 2002. For whites, the numbers were $35,344 for men and $21,379 for women (also losing ground).

More

0 Comments | More in Inequality | Topics: African-American wages

June 11, 2013 at 10:22 AM

Household wealth still far from recovery

Four years after the official end of the recession, the average American household has recovered only 62.8 percent of the wealth it lost in the crash. The findings come from a new report by William Emmons and Bryan Noeth at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. That’s in real dollars. All household net wealth has rebounded 114.3 percent from the trough to a record high, but it doesn’t account for inflation or increased population. Adjusted for these factors, the number is well below where it stood in 2006. And the recovery is highly uneven, mostly benefiting the better off with the stock-market boom and saving the big banks.

According to the Fed’s Survey of Consumer Finances, household finances were “severely” affected by the downturn. Median household wealth dropped 39 percent. Among those worst hurt were the young, those with less than a college education, minorities and those carrying heavy debt. With wages largely stagnant, wealth was increasingly dependent on housing, which was in a bubble. In a separate essay by Emmons and Ray Boshara, the importance of household balance sheets to the larger economy is explained. This element was largely discounted by many macroeconomists before the collapse.

It has come as somewhat of a surprise, therefore, that many economists now are calling the Great Recession of 2007-09 a “balance-sheet recession” and that balance-sheet failures of the type described above are seen as important contributors to the downturn and weak recovery.

More

0 Comments | More in Consumer spending, Debt, Demographics, Great Recession, Housing, Inequality, Jobs/Unemployment

September 26, 2012 at 1:21 PM

Washington households see a sharp wealth divide

The well-off are doing very well in Washington, according to a new study from the state Office of Financial Management, which studied the distribution of income, wealth and taxes across Washington households from 2005 to 2009. In 2009, 54.8 percent of total income went to the top 20 percent of households, while 1.6 percent went to the bottom 20 percent. In 2005, the top 20 received 57.4 percent of total Washington income, while the bottom 20 got 1.5 percent of income.

More than half the total wealth in the state was held by the top 5 percent, in a study that noted the wealth estimates for the richest Washingtonians were probably understated. Those in the bottom 10 percent had a negative net worth.

“Washington has a top-heavy income and wealth distribution,” the study concluded. On the other hand, economic mobility was not dead. Slicing the households into tens, the researchers found that more households moved to a higher slice than a lower one, and lower groups were more likely to move up. Incomes and wealth were reduced for all groups by the Great Recession, with the higher-end taking a bigger hit. Those in the middle held their own. Also, every group lost purchasing power from 2005 to 2009.

More

0 Comments | More in Income/living standards, Inequality

Next Page »