Follow us:

Microsoft Pri0

Welcome to Microsoft Pri0: That's Microspeak for top priority, and that's the news and observations you'll find here from Seattle Times technology reporter Matt Day.

August 6, 2007 at 5:32 PM

Judge reverses Microsoft verdict, was largest in history

Time to reset the record books — at least for the moment. A San Diego judge today reversed the $1.52 billion jury verdict Alcatel-Lucent won against Microsoft in a patent dispute.

At issue were two digital music patents owned by Alcatel-Lucent, but originally granted to Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, a German company.

In post-trial motions, Microsoft had asked U.S. District Court Judge Rudi Brewster to reverse the verdict, order a new trial or dramatically reduce the damage award.

The judge ruled that Windows Media Player does not infringe on one the patents, and Microsoft had properly paid Fraunhofer to license the other one.

Alcatel-Lucent intends to appeal.

In a statement issued this afternoon, Brad Smith, Microsoft’s general counsel, called the ruling “a victory for consumers of digital music and a triumph for common sense in the patent system.”

He went on to note that this clarifies a murky legal situation that threatened many other companies who use the patented technologies at issue in the case. Alcatel’s victory had raised the possibility it could pursue similar action against other companies that have licensed the technology from Fraunhofer. There were 454 “licensed companies” listed on the Web site mp3licensing.com, which is affiliated with Fraunhofer. They include Apple, Intel, Motorola, Nintendo, RealNetworks and Sony.

“For the hundreds of companies large and small that rely on MP3 technology, the Court’s ruling clarifies that these companies have properly licensed the technology embodied in the ‘080 patent from its co-owner and industry recognized MP3 licensor — Fraunhofer,” Smith said.

Oh yeah, and for the record, the largest jury verdict ever was $925 million won by Polaroid against Kodak in 1991.

Comments | More in Microsoft

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►