Follow us:

Microsoft Pri0

Welcome to Microsoft Pri0: That's Microspeak for top priority, and that's the news and observations you'll find here from Seattle Times technology reporter Matt Day.

April 21, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Ninth Circuit declines to hear Microsoft appeal in ‘Vista Capable’ suit

That’s the early word from lawyers representing the plaintiffs in the suit. Remember, Microsoft was seeking to appeal the judge’s class certification in the suit. With the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals declining to take up the case, it should proceed in U.S. District Court.

More to come on this as it develops.

Update, 12 p.m.: Plaintiffs’ attorney Jeffrey Thomas said by phone that his side is pleased with the Ninth Circuit’s decision and “we’re looking forward to proceeding with discovery.”

Microsoft spokesman Jack Evans said in an e-mail, “The Ninth Circuit’s decision not to accept our request for interim review is not a ruling on the merits of our case. We look forward to the ultimate dismissal of what the district court itself said is a novel claim.”

Discovery in this case has been damaging to Microsoft. E-mails that came out in the class certification process outlined an internal debate about Vista’s marketing and readiness for certain types of hardware.

The case stems from a Microsoft program to prop up PC demand after the release of Windows Vista was delayed, missing the 2006 holidays — a key sales period for consumer PCs.

The plaintiffs alleged that PCs marked “Windows Vista Capable” could run only the “Basic” version of the operating system, not the “Premium” version, which they consider to be the “real” Vista, based on the company’s marketing. Microsoft argued that its marketing delineated between machines that could run the Premium version and those that could not.

In February, U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman certified a class of people who purchased “Windows Vista Capable” PCs that did not also bear the “Premium Ready” designation.

Comments | More in Windows Vista

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►