Follow us:

Northwest Voices

Seattle Times letters to the editor

February 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM

The previous administration

Treacherous “trickle down”

The financial shortfall we’re experiencing here in the state of Washington is the surest example of the “trickle down” theory ever presented. The disaster spawned at the federal level, following eight years of increasing deficits under the previous administration, has finally trickled down to the state level.

As the deregulations of the Bush administration led to banking excesses that have now imploded, leading to the worst depression since the 1930s, it is taking all the sates down with it. California is at the verge of bankruptcy. Virtually all other states are in serious deficit along with California. It’s all “trickle down.”

We can thank the financial missteps of the Bush administration for this.

What are Republican legislators in our state doing to help pull us out of this, other than repeat the same misguided philosophy of the Republicans in Washington, D.C.?

I’m looking to both Washingtons for new thinking. But as we saw when 100 percent of Republicans in “the other Washington” (the House of Representatives) stuck to the misguided policies of the past that brought us to our knees, I see Republicans here doing the very same thing.

In my opinion, it’s unbelievably dumb.

— Bruce Barnbaum, Granite Falls

Even torture is justifiable

I read the Opinion piece on Tuesday, Feb. 3, of Supreme Court Justice Richard B. Sanders [“Bush team must be held accountable for crimes,” guest column].

I find this article extremely elitist. While he points out that the “Bush team” brought us tyranny, I say, as far as the security of our country and our people is concerned, internment, phone taping and, yes, even torture is justifiable.

Do not forget we were attacked and thousands died. Does Justice Sanders rate this as trifle?

Also, remember that we have not been attacked since 9/11. Would Justice Sanders prefer an atomic bomb be smuggled into the country and detonated?

I am sure, as long as the rule of law were followed, it would be OK.

Justice Sanders might have noticed we were at war. Every president has taken away some of our rights during war. President Lincoln did during the Civil War and, as Sanders pointed out, President Roosevelt did the same.

While it is regrettable, it can sometimes be justified.

Suppose Justice Sanders were president and there were the possibility of a major attack, in which many people would be killed. He had in his hands a man who knew the details of this attack. Would he deny this terrorist his rights and avoid destruction of our country, or would he shrug his shoulders saying, “We couldn’t stop this carnage because of the rule of law.”

I think Justice Sanders should walk in the shoes of a president whose job it is to protect people, not the rights of terrorists.

Sorry, Mr. Justice. I believe you live in a far different land then most of us, “the people,” do.

— Rockey Roth, Lake Forest Park

No one above the law, indeed

Justice Richard B. Sanders’ comments regarding the alleged crimes of the Bush administration and the need to prosecute its members are most interesting.

He states the Bush administration has damaged the Constitution. Certainly the actions of the Bush presidency were and are no more injurious of the Constitution than those of Abe Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson or Franklin D. Roosevelt, in their times of national emergency. And yet, the Constitution survived, as well as the republic.

That aside, I find Sanders’ comments about “no one being above the law” most curious. I do not recall him protesting from his pulpit the actions of a previous president who knowingly perjured himself. No one above the law, indeed!

I hear no outcry about the new administration’s chosen appointees, who can’t quite seem to remember to pay their taxes. No one above the law, indeed.

Or, how about one of his own, who committed a DUI and a felony hit and run, sitting on the bench. No one above the law, indeed.

If I were a cynic I might attribute it to political preference. Sanders might think about the old saying, “Those who live in glass houses. . . .”

— Robert Kipper, Bothell

Comments | More in Bush administration, Iraq war, Politics


No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.

The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►