Follow us:

Northwest Voices

Seattle Times letters to the editor

May 10, 2013 at 11:43 AM

Plan would strive to make Seattle carbon neutral by 2050

Seattle should be carbon neutral by 2020

Chris Johanning, with Puget Sound Solar of Seattle, seals an attic in a home in Seattle's View Ridge neighborhood to make it more energy efficient. Taking steps to increase energy efficiency in buildings is a key part of Seattle's Climate Action Plan. (Ellen M. Banner / The Seattle Times)

Chris Johanning, with Puget Sound Solar of Seattle, seals an attic in a home in Seattle’s View Ridge neighborhood to make it more energy efficient. Taking steps to increase energy efficiency in buildings is a key part of Seattle’s Climate Action Plan. (Ellen M. Banner / The Seattle Times)

I applaud city leaders for promoting a carbon-neutral plan for Seattle by 2050 [“Seattle plan would make city carbon neutral by 2050,” NWMonday, May 6]. Nevertheless, 2050 is far too distant a target. Most of the council will be dead by then, so it’s really an empty promise to make.Much more important is how much we cut our carbon emissions in the next decade. Dutch government scientific advisers estimate the rich countries must reduce emissions by 50 percent by 2020 if we are to have an even chance of limiting global temperature rises to 2 degrees Celsius. Two degrees is the widely agreed upon limit for dangerous climate change. We have already raised temperatures by 0.8 degrees and we have lost most of the Arctic ice. Two degrees by midcentury will be playing with fire.

The Center for American Progress estimates we spent $188 billion on climate-related disasters in the last three years alone. That’s $400 per household. If people think converting to a low-carbon economy will be expensive, they ought to try to imagine how much we would have to spend in a 2 (or more) degree future, or how we will feed ourselves with growing populations, more extreme weather and lower crop yields.

The City Council should go back to the drawing board and offer us a responsible plan for significant carbon abatement by 2020 that is more in line with our intelligence and conscience.

Colin Wright, Seattle

Comments | More in Energy, Environment | Topics: carbon neutral, energy, energy-efficient

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►