Follow us:

Northwest Voices

Seattle Times letters to the editor

July 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM

Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Consider issues from both sides

I commend U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for his condemnation of Hamas’ acts of firing missiles indiscriminately into Israel [“Despite offensive, Gaza rockets still hit Israel,” Nation & World, July 14]. However, I am concerned about his objections of Israel’s right to retaliate in force.

Many so-called liberals (and I consider myself one) look at the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from one side only. They see Palestinian civilians being killed by a well-armed Israel. They should look at the situation from the Israeli perspective also. Israel is a small country with irregular, hard-to-defend borders. It is surrounded by enemies sworn to its destruction. It has been forced, since its inception, to devote a large portion of its gross national product to defense.

Almost immediately after Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005, Hamas took over. (Hamas has been condemned as a terrorist organization by the U.S., Israel and many other countries.) It has been firing rockets indiscriminately into Israel since that time. In the last few days, Hamas has significantly increased its attacks. What would most people do if they, their friends and their family were constantly threatened with physical harm? What might Secretary-General Ban, who is a South Korean, do if North Korea began firing into South Korea? I believe he would retaliate with as much force as necessary to stop the attacks. And what would he do if the enemy were hiding amongst non-combatants?

Maybe, as the Israelis have been doing, he would warn non-combatants in advance when practical. To those who do not support the actions of Israel, I would like to ask you honestly what you would do if you were in such a situation.

Ted Coskey, Seattle

Comments | More in Israel, Middle East | Topics: Hamas, Israel, Palestinians

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►