403 Forbidden


nginx
403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx
Follow us:
403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx

Northwest Voices

Seattle Times letters to the editor

January 16, 2015 at 4:52 PM

Charlie Hebdo attack: We cannot appease those who restrict speech

Frank Mitchell’s letter to the editor “We are learning the consequences of the excesses of free speech” [Northwest Voices, Jan. 12] suggests that the the victims at Charlie Hebdo were responsible for their own deaths because of “excesses of freedom of speech.”
Beyond slander or yelling fire in a crowded theater, I was unaware that there was such a thing as  “excesses of freedom of speech.”  Did Daniel Pearl or James Foley deserve to lose their heads for trying to report the news? Was Malala Yousafzai justly shot in the head because of what she wrote in her blog? Did Salman Rushdie earn a contract on his life for writing a novel that mentions Islam?
We are expected to be tolerant of the intolerant by restricting our freedom of speech, and I for one find that notion intolerable. Mitchell tells us that those who ignore history are bound to repeat it.  I agree.  Neville Chamberlain proved that appeasement in the face of evil is ineffectual. Let us not repeat that mistake in history.
We will never change any minds by shooting them. Make no mistake, this is a battle of ideals. Words are our best weapon against this enemy. Let us not spare them until the evil within Islam dies.
Marshall Dunlap, Kent

Comments | More in Terrorism | Topics: Charlie Hebdo, Free speech, Islam

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx
403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx