You are viewing the most recent posts on this topic.
March 18, 2013 at 5:30 PM
EPA plan is not entirely inclusive
The decision facing us on Seattle’s hometown river has the potential to be transformational [“Historic pollution, epic cleanup on the Duwamish,” Opinion, March 15]. Now that cleanup is beginning, will we choose an approach that benefits just some, or all of the river’s communities?
The river serves a vibrant mix of residents, kayakers, fishermen, tribes, and businesses, but the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed plan is not expected to protect the health of fishermen and tribal members, and won’t meet Washington state’s health standards.
We can do better.
There is a lot to like in the EPA plan, but to craft a truly equitable and sustainable river cleanup, we need to:
— Protect our investment in cleanup, by enforcing controls on ongoing pollution;
— Remove as much contaminated sediment as possible, to protect against re-exposing toxic waste in an earthquake or major flood; and
_ Hire local, so the benefits of cleanup flow to those who have been most impacted by the river’s legacy of pollution.
Many opportunities to weigh in are coming up — from public hearings, to interactive community workshops or simply posting your comments online. Whatever you decide to do, just do it — the future of Seattle’s only river depends on the choices we make.
–BJ Cummings, Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition/Technical Advisory Group, Seattle
Trending with readers