Follow us:

Northwest Voices

Seattle Times letters to the editor

Topic: net neutrality

You are viewing the most recent posts on this topic.

February 11, 2015 at 6:50 AM

Net neutrality should be enacted by Congress

I agree we need strong new net neutrality rules, but they should be enacted by Congress, not the Federal Communications Commission [“Getting a win for net neutrality,” Opinion, Feb. 3]. The FCC regulations guest columnist Timothy Karr favors face several difficulties. For one, the FCC’s plan to classify the Internet as a Title II…


Comments | More in Internet | Topics: Everett M. Ehrlich, FCC, Federal Communications Commission

November 23, 2014 at 9:14 AM

Net neutrality: Would you want an ISP to deny connection?

The recent letter claiming net neutrality is similar to requiring all restaurants charge the same amount is typical of the confusion over what net neutrality actually is. Net neutrality is not about the speed of your Internet connection or telling Internet service providers (ISPs) what they can charge. Nobody is claiming ISPs should not be…


Comments | More in Internet | Topics: Internet, net neutrality, Russ Glaeser

November 12, 2014 at 6:05 AM

Net neutrality: GOP siding with business

Just who do the Republicans think President Obama represents? Obviously, they firmly believe the president represents only business interests [“Obama steps into divisive debate on net neutrality,” Nation & World, Nov. 11]. I have news for them. President Obama represents the people. The “overreach” the GOP is complaining about is quite necessary: The Internet…


Comments | More in Internet | Topics: Elizabeth Williams, Internet, net neutrality

September 4, 2014 at 5:23 PM

Net neutrality: Government needed to keep Internet open

There is a core assumption from guest columnist and academic Brent Skorup that the government is evil and that commercial operations such as Google, Facebook, Apple and Comcast are better [“The Internet is not like an electric or water utility,” Opinion, Aug. 31]. His assertions that we should not let the government regulate broadband…


Comments | Topics: Federal Communications Commission, Internet, net neutrality

September 3, 2014 at 7:06 AM

Net neutrality: Trust the government over cable companies

It seems that guest columnist Brent Skorup [“The Internet is not a public utility,” Opinion, Sept. 1] is asking us to trust the corporations to govern themselves and not trust the government to regulate the Internet. I trust the government more than the corporations. I envision an Internet that is just a huge, wide open…


Comments | Topics: Federal Communications Commission, Internet, net neutrality

September 2, 2014 at 6:23 PM

Net neutrality: Irrational fear of censorship

On Sept. 1 the Times featured an opinion piece “The Internet is not a public utility.” The guest columnist strongly insinuates that all regulations on Internet service providers are bad while carefully not mentioning what any of the regulations do. The regulations he derides prevent service providers from censoring your content or price gouging…


Comments | Topics: Internet, net neutrality

September 1, 2014 at 7:06 AM

Net neutrality, FCC: The Internet is already open

It’s great that so many are interested in preserving and nurturing the Internet; unfortunately, much of the discussion is misguided. The Seattle Times’ editorial [“Innovation would be stifled under FCC’s plans,” Opinion, Aug 19] is one example of well-intentioned, but misguided. The Federal Communications Commission did not propose a “two-tiered” Internet, and has said there…


Comments | Topics: broadband, Federal Communications Commission, net neutrality

May 23, 2014 at 6:03 AM

Net neutrality: A market-driven idea to give discounts to users

Columnist Brier Dudley wrote that continuing with Internet neutrality is like taking general traffic lanes away for buses, making traffic worse for everyone [“Net neutrality more myth than reality?” Business/Technology, May 19]. In the Internet world, his analogy goes, the traffic comes chiefly from the demand for high-quality video delivered over the Internet. This…


Comments | More in Internet | Topics: Brier Dudley, FCC, Internet

May 22, 2014 at 7:28 AM

What would a future without net neutrality look like?

Gabriel Campanario / The Seattle Times

Gabriel Campanario / The Seattle Times

The Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler has proposed new rules for the Internet that would create “fast lanes” for certain content providers — which could allow Internet service providers (ISPs) to charge companies and websites for faster delivery of their content to consumers. The Internet, as consumers know it, could change drastically.

The Seattle Times opinion pages asked readers to imagine a future Internet with toll booths and fast lanes for content providers. Below are several responses:

Fast lanes would limit competition

Net neutrality is a major issue that should be given serious attention. Internet speeds must remain uniform for all users. Anything else would be noncompetitive and unfair. Based on The Seattle Times’ editorial, I have submitted the following to the Federal Communications Commission:

“I believe and urge that the FCC maintain a neutral Internet whereby all Internet traffic travels at the same, highest possible, speed. It seems patently unfair to


Comments | More in Internet | Topics: fast lanes, Federal Communications Commission, net neutrality

March 5, 2014 at 7:01 AM

Net neutrality: Reclassify ISPs as Common Carriers

The Internet scarcely even existed 25 years ago, yet we all now depend on it [“FCC won’t appeal ruling on Internet neutrality,” Business / Technolgoy, Feb. 19]. What an amazing change in a single generation. And now, while our attention is being distracted by foolishness in Washington, D.C., the wide-open information on the Internet…


Comments | More in Internet | Topics: Federal Communications Commission, Internet Service Providers, net neutrality

Next Page »