Follow us:

Opinion Northwest

Join the informed writers of The Times' editorial board in lively discussions at our blog, Opinion Northwest.

April 3, 2013 at 3:37 PM

Bipartisan Senate budget a work in progress

The state Senate’s proposed 2013-15 budget is a valiant, if awkward, effort at bipartisan negotiation.

The effort is valiant because it strategically directs $1.5 billion to new education funding, including fully funding evidence-based ideas to help high-poverty schools, expanding full-day kindergarten and responding to the state Supreme Court’s McCleary decision. These are the priorities promised by the Republican-dominated Majority Coalition when it upended Democrats’ control.

It ends ridiculous increases in college tuition, and adds needed money to the State Need Grant for low-income college students. It also reflects the tenuousness of our still-recovering economy by slowing overall spending.

But the budget’s failure to add any new revenue by extending existing taxes or closing of unjustified tax preferences, as The Seattle Times editorial board has suggested, results in unnecessary cuts to the poor and vulnerable. To make this a bipartisan budget — and not just a bipartisan negotiation — the Majority Coalition will need to budge from its ideological aversion to revenue.

In the spirit of bipartisanship, Democrats should ignore labor’s likely objections and take a hard look at the budget’s surprising use of Obamacare, which saves $128 million by shifting 20,000 part-time workers to the state-run health care insurance exchange.

The Senate has worked out bipartisan deals before. Sens. Andy Hill, R-Redmond, and Jim Hargrove, D-Hoquiam, negotiated in good faith for months.

As Hill told reporters this morning, “We met 32 nights. We ordered 63 pizzas. We had three Chinese take-outs and my legislative assistant cooked up two Crock-pot dinners. In all, 16 senators were involved in budget building and writing. We had a small army of staff and 243 Diet Cokes. I did not drink them all.”

Nonetheless, the awkwardness was on display when Hargrove stepped in after Hill curtly answered a reporter’s question about the lack of funding for the politically contentious DREAM Act, which would have expanded the State Need Grant for students brought to the U.S. illegally as children.

“What you see is some of the tension that’s left,” said Hargrove. “Andy has some tension on his side, and I have some tension on my side. You guys are focusing some of the tension areas… We’re still trying to still like each other when we leave the press conference this morning.”

Here is video of the news conference from TVW.

[do action=”custom_iframe” url=”” width=”630″ height=”500″ scrolling=””/]


Comments | Topics: Andy Hill, Jim Hargrove, majority coalition caucus


No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.

The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►