Follow us:

Opinion Northwest

Join the informed writers of The Times' editorial board in lively discussions at our blog, Opinion Northwest.

April 29, 2013 at 6:15 AM

Liberal Washington state cannot come to terms with gay marriage

Arlene's Flowers, which faces legal action after denying service to a gay couple, is in Sen. Brown's district. (AP Photo/Tri-City Herald, Bob Brawdy)

Arlene’s Flowers, which faces legal action after denying service to a gay couple, is in Sen. Brown’s legislative district.
(AP Photo/Tri-City Herald, Bob Brawdy)

The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on gay marriage in June, but some Washington lawmakers are unable to get past gay people existing, never mind getting married.  State Sen. Sharon Brown, R-Kennewick introduced  a proposed law that would allow businesses to deny service to gay and lesbian customers. This Associated Press story gives more details. One step forward, two steps back.

One of Brown’s constituents is the Richland florist facing state legal action for refusing wedding-related services to a gay couple. This is constituent service at its most extreme and its most repugnant.

Senate Bill 5927 isn’t likely to pick up steam in the Washington Legislature’s special session that starts May 13. But if it did it would seek to supersede protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation codified in state law in 2006.

Still just knowing the bill was introduced last Friday and not immediately booed into oblivion by senators rankles.

Not that there wasn’t swift outrage.

“I haven’t seen a law this backwards and mean-spirited since before the civil rights victories of the 1960s,” said Sen, Jeanne Kohl-Welles in an email blast. “This bill is a license to discriminate.”

It is also an effort beneath the Senate Republican majority which promised to focus on jobs, education and state spending. No jobs would be created by alienating gay consumers. Indeed, one would expect quite a few to be lost.

Joseph Backholm, executive director of the Family Policy Institute of Washington, told the Associated Press he hopes the bill sparks a discussion. Indeed it should. The conversation should explore why more than 200 years later some still don’t understand that all people are created equal.

 

 

 

Comments | Topics: discrimination, republicans, same-sex marriage

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►