Follow us:

Opinion Northwest

Join the informed writers of The Times' editorial board in lively discussions at our blog, Opinion Northwest.

June 26, 2013 at 5:56 PM

Dithering in Olympia won’t solve transportation needs

Failure by the state House to pass a $10 billion transportation funding package Thursday narrows the room to maneuver on this bill to a window as tight as the overhead clearance on the collapsed Skagit River bridge.

Only one Republican – Rep. Hans Zeigler of Puyallup – joined the Democratic majority in support. Six Democrats voted against, including – surprisingly – capital budget committee Chair Hans Dunshee and Majority Whip Kevin Van De Wege. That guaranteed the proposal’s failure to reach the mandatory 50 votes (The vote count was 48-42). A seventh Democrat, Rep. Marco Liias, a champion of the package, voted no for procedural reasons, in order to bring the bill back for a new vote on Thursday.

The transportation package, written by Rep. Judy Clibborn, D-Mercer Island, is funded in part by a 10.5 cent-per-gallon boost in the gas tax. It has a business-labor-environment-bike coalition behind it, because transportation needs are not solving themselves. But leaders in the Republican-dominated Majority Coalition in the Senate have quietly lobbied the House to reject the passage, so they won’t have to take a vote. Publicola reports that Sen. Steve Litzow of Mercer Island leaned on Rep. Maureen Walsh to switch from a yes to no vote (she did).

Walsh says Sen. Litzow told her “he thinks it’s dead” in the senate,” adding: “Mo, why would you do that [vote for it]? I don’t care if you’re the 55th vote or the 54th vote, but don’t be the 50th vote.”

Listening to debate on the House floor Thursday, Republicans gave a litany of reasons to dislike this package. Projects cost too much. The Interstate 5 Columbia River Bridge proposal was wrongly designed. Bonding costs were too high.

Those are arguments to be made earlier in the session. Now, five days before a partial shutdown of state government, it’s time for a vote out of the House and into the Senate.

The Seattle Times has editorialized in favor of that at least three times in the past two months – here, herehere. The News Tribune of Tacoma did so this afternoon, demanding “No Excuses.” The Herald of Everett and Spokesman-Review of Spokane also editorialized in favor.

If the Majority Coalition in the Senate scuttles this package because of internal strife between its anti-tax purists and the King County moderates who birthed it, that is a darn good reason to question its ability to provide strong, forward-thinking leadership.

Comments | Topics: majority coalition caucus, Washington State Legislature

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►