Follow us:

Pac-12 Confidential

Bud Withers offers an inside look at the Pac-12 Conference and the national college scene.

November 7, 2013 at 10:27 AM

It’s the best college-football Saturday of the season . . . on Thursday night

It’s big-game Thursday night in college football, with Baylor, No. 6 in the BCS standings, hosting Oklahoma (No. 10), and No. 3-slotted Oregon at No. 5 Stanford. Come to think of it, it has to rank up there among the best non-Saturday cards in the game’s history, other than perhaps some day-after-Thanksgiving schedules, and maybe the classic Thanksgiving Day, Nebraska-Oklahoma game of 1971.

What’s at stake? Well, for three teams, a chance to keep alive hopes for the final BCS championship game before the sport enters the playoff age in 2014.

In the Pac-12, if you’re simply rooting for the conference’s interests, it’s probably best to side with the Ducks, who are presumed to be no worse than No. 2 in the BCS standings if they win out, passing current No. 2 Florida State. Then there’s the question of what a win by either school does for the likelihood of two BCS bids to the Pac-12. Either way, I’d think it would be in good shape, barring losses down the road.

Overall, it’s likely the Pac-12 will have more eligibles than the seven bowls with which it is affiliated — perhaps eight, nine or as many as 10 — so it helps the league if two of the top teams find homes in the BCS. It’s traditionally been worth about $400,000 per school in the league if two of its brethren make the BCS.

It gets pretty crazy if Stanford upsets Oregon — especially if it could do so in a convincing way. That’s where the debate might get hot and heavy. Could a one-loss Cardinal team muscle past an undefeated Baylor and a spotless Ohio State to the title game? Seems unlikely that it would have a great case against unbeaten Florida State, but both the Big 12 and Big Ten are inferior to the Pac-12 this year.

But a Ducks loss, at least in the short-term, would be a setback for the league, which badly needs to win a national title to strip away some of the SEC superiority that has been built up through its astonishing seven-year run of BCS championships.

Comments

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►