Follow us:

Pac-12 Confidential

Bud Withers offers an inside look at the Pac-12 Conference and the national college scene.

August 4, 2014 at 8:21 PM

The Gonzaga-Washington series to resume: What’s not to like?

At long last, Gonzaga and Washington have moved a mountain. It appeared things were moving in this direction, and Monday, they made it official, announcing they’ll resume their basketball series in 2016-17. The fact it will have been a decade since they last played speaks to the obstacles — both in scheduling and raw feelings — that have stood in the way.

Some thoughts:

* I had always hunched they’d somehow meet in the NCAA tournament, which was quite possible in a couple or three years, including in 2009 when they were evenly matched and both played at the Rose Garden in Portland. But they were in different regions. Got to believe that would have been a hot ticket.

* Among the reasons this is a good thing is that rivalries in our state have fallen flat in recent years. WSU checked out of relevance during the Ken Bone regime, and the UW-WSU series has been mostly a yawner. Cameron Dollar can’t seem to get traction at Seattle U., which Washington has been scheduling regularly. And Eastern Washington hasn’t been a factor. So Gonzaga-Washington is a natural for regional interest. It’s also a cheap trip.

* I get a kick out of fans on both sides, arguing that the the other program “needs us more than we need them.” The fact is, neither one “needs” the other. It’s the fans who need, and deserve, the rivalry. (Funny how fan loyalties can color logic.) Washington has more quality games within the Pac-12, so it hardly has to lean on Gonzaga for such opposition. And if you think the Zags need the Huskies because they play in a lesser league, well, you’ve been off in a cave for too long. A program that has recently had home-and-home agreements with Michigan State, Illinois, Oklahoma State, Butler and Baylor doesn’t “need” the Huskies.

* It will be interesting to see who gets first crack at hosting in the four-year agreement. I know the Zags felt that because it was Washington that chose to stop the series, Gonzaga should get the first game. But sometimes those preferences have to take a back seat to scheduling balance, and if, for example, one school has a heavy tilt toward home or road games in 2016-17 or 2017-18 and needs to square matters, that can take priority. (In scheduling, it’s also seen sort of as oneupmanship to get the first game, which then leaves the first host the option of buying out the second game and bailing. That doesn’t apply here, though. After 10 years of frayed relations and schedule difficulties, ain’t gonna happen.)

Comments

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►