Topic: Charter Amendment 19
You are viewing the most recent posts on this topic.
November 1, 2013 at 6:09 PM
With just about $5,000 in reported contributions, the group Choices Not Districts, which opposes the ballot measure to change the way city council members are elected, made robo calls over the past week to voters older than 55.
Former City Councilmember Jim Street, who opposes the plan to divide the city into seven geographical districts with two at-large positions elected by the whole city, recorded the phone message against Charter Amendment 19. He tells voters that currently, they vote for all nine city council members and that those nine are accountable to every voter and every neighborhood in the city, rather than just those in their one district.
The recording also notes that Seattle residents have turned down district elections three times before.
The Seattle Districts Now campaign has vastly outraised the opposition. North Seattle business woman Faye Garneau has contributed about $232,000 to the campaign. Another $5,400 was donated by Fremont business woman Suzie Burke. In all, the yes campaign has raised about $263,000 through Thursday.
The supporters for council districts have mailed flyers to Seattle voters and put up yard signs around the city.
The pro-districts campaign argues that candidates running for a district seat won’t have to spend as much money to get known in a district of 88,000 residents rather than 630,000 in the city as a whole. They also argue that city funding for streets, parks and police will be more equitably distributed under a district system.
October 16, 2013 at 11:52 AM
The good-government Municipal League today weighed in on two Seattle ballot measures that have largely gone under the radar. The League’s Foundation Board voted to support a public financing measure for City Council races, Proposition 1, while it opposed a measure to elect seven City Council members by geographic district and two at-large.
Interestingly, those are the exact opposite positions taken by the Seattle Times editorial board in this morning’s paper.
The Muni League called the public financing measure a well-considered effort to bring back a taxpayer-funded system Seattle had in place from 1979 to 1984. “If successfully implemented, [Prop. 1] has the potential to expand the number of qualified candidates and the competitiveness of campaigns,” the Board said in announcing its support.
The Board said on district elections that it was “not persuaded that there is sufficient evidence that the current at-large representation is not working or needs to change.”
About this blog
Trending with readers