403 Forbidden


nginx
403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx
Follow us:
403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx

Popcorn & Prejudice: A Movie Blog

Seattle Times writer Moira Macdonald muses on moviegoing. Email Moira: mmacdonald@seattletimes.com.

November 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM

The MPAA strikes again: “The King’s Speech” rated R

I was raving, back in September, about “The King’s Speech,” which I saw at the Toronto International Film Festival and which immediately became one of my favorite films of the year. (Its Seattle opening date keeps shifting around; formerly on Thanksgiving, it now looks to be coming here for Christmas.) The true story of how England’s King George VI overcame a devastating speech impediment, it’s a wonderfully acted (by Colin Firth as the king, Geoffrey Rush as his speech therapist, and Helena Bonham Carter as his wife, the future Queen Mum) slice of history.
But the ever-clueless members of the MPAA ratings board are concerned about teenagers seeing this film — because of one scene in which the king, in the course of his treatment, lets fly a string of swear words. Because, of course, no teenager has ever heard the F-word. And because that would, apparently, be far more upsetting to a young person than, say, the kind of explicit violence seen in movies like “Salt,” “Casino Royale,” and “Taken” — to name three movies recently granted the rating of PG-13. It’s fine, says the MPAA, to let kids watch people get shot in the head and killed, as long as nobody’s swearing.
So “The King’s Speech” gets an R — the same rating, the L.A. Times’ Patrick Goldstein points out, as “Saw 3D.” Tom Hooper, director of “The King’s Speech,” spoke about his disappointment:

What I take away from that decision,” says Hooper, “is that violence and torture is OK, but bad language isn’t. I can’t think of a single film I’ve ever seen where the swear words had haunted me forever, the way a scene of violence or torture has, yet the ratings board only worries about the bad language.”

An MPAA spokesperson told the L.A. Times that the board is merely being consistent: “We’ve made clear what our language guidelines are, and it’s not fair, in fact it would look arbitrary, if we threw it out for just one film.” But Goldstein points out that the guidelines are, indeed, arbitrary: More than one use of the F-word, for example, earns an automatic R, but there’s no rule about how many, say, gunshots or gallons of blood quality for a PG-13 or an R.
It’s true that I can’t imagine that teenagers will be storming the multiplexes wanting to see “The King’s Speech” — but those interested in English history, or those who like Colin Firth, or perhaps those seeking inspiration from someone who publicly overcame a speech impediment will have to sneak in. And then, apparently, seek therapy to recover from the shock of hearing a grownup swear. Sigh. Just another day at the MPAA.

Colin Firth and Helena Bonham Carter in “The King’s Speech” (photo courtesy The Weinstein Company)

Comments

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx
403 Forbidden

403 Forbidden


nginx