Follow us:

Popcorn & Prejudice: A Movie Blog

Seattle Times writer Moira Macdonald muses on moviegoing. Email Moira:

February 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM

Catching up with ‘Downton Abbey’

(Need I say — if you’re behind on Season 3, beware; spoilers abound.)
Back from a little vacation and ready to talk “Downton Abbey” — or, if you prefer, Upside Downton Abbey:

(Those Muppets look uncannily right, don’t they? Particularly Carson’s eyebrows, and the Dowager Countess’s lavender gown.)
So, a friend who’d been lagging a bit behind on her “Downton Abbey” watching called me over the weekend. “Sybil’s dead!!” she said, before even saying hello. Well, yes, she is, and now everyone’s had a week to process. What did you think? Sadly I’d already heard that Jessica Brown Findlay wanted out of the show (to focus on making movies, I believe), so knew it was coming — but the show kind of gave us a sucker punch by safely delivering the baby and letting us think everything was OK. And then, oh — that awful sound of running footsteps in the night, and how quickly the end came, with the plaintive wail of a motherless baby girl from somewhere down the hall. This is soap opera, to be sure, but of a very high order, and I was completely mesmerized — particularly by the scene with Carson and the Dowager Countess. Jim Carter and Maggie Smith so perfectly nailed the very particular kind of intimacy these two characters have: not kinship, not friendship, but a closeness stemming from many decades of living side-by-side. The upstairs/downstairs curtain seemed to be lifted, just for a moment, as she patted his hand. And, as she walked away and stumbled on her cane, just a bit . . . well, she didn’t get to be Dame Maggie for nothing. Lovely scene.
Elsewhere: Bates is finally to be freed, and thank goodness for that as I don’t think I could have handled this subplot for much longer. “Downton Abbey” falters when it leaves its setting — the house, and the surrounding village, is a beloved character — and Julian Fellowes never seemed to find a way to make Bates’ plight dramatically interesting. I could do with a little less of Ethel; it seemed like her story played out last season already, and here it’s just an excuse for Isobel Crawley (who I love, because she has no idea how insufferable she is, and Penelope Wilton plays this so well) to meddle. And Lord Grantham is having a rough season of it; I don’t remember him being such a villain in previous years. Really — naming the baby after her mother is “ghoulish”? Luckily the Dowager Countess is, it turns out, a rather effective marriage counselor; particularly if you share her rather elastic definition of the word “lie.”
And no, Mrs. Patmore does not look like a frolicker. Could she please repeat that line in every episode?
What do you think of the season so far?



No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.

The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.

The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►