Follow us:

The Today File

Your guide to the latest news from around the Northwest

July 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM

National higher-ed newspaper critical of Gates Foundation’s influence

A well-respected national newspaper that covers higher education published a package of stories Monday that was critical of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s influence on higher education.

The Chronicle of Higher Education report calculated that the Seattle foundation has spent $472 million to remake U.S. higher education since 2006. The amount makes the foundation the largest player in the higher education reform movement.

In the report, which raises questions about the extent of the foundation’s influence, The Chronicle says it has funded research, advocated reform policies and helped build a consensus among other foundations, state lawmakers, policy advocates and the Obama administration that emphasizes “graduating more students, more quickly, and at a lower cost, with little discussion of the alternatives.”

The report says that higher-education analysts who don’t agree with the Gates approach “see their expertise bypassed as Gates moves aggressively to develop strategies for reform.”

“Some leaders and analysts are uneasy about the future that Gates is buying: a system of education designed for maximum measurability, delivered increasingly through technology, and — these critics say — narrowly focused on equipping students for short-term employability,” the Chronicle report says.

The report also notes that the foundation has kept its reform goals on the national agenda by supporting news organizations that cover higher education. That includes The Chronicle, which has received two contracts totaling about $850,000 from the foundation to support work on two stand-alone websites, College Completion and College Reality Check.

Most of the report is available for free for the next few days on The Chronicle’s website.

Comments | More in Education | Topics: Gates Foundation, higher education

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


Advertising
The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►