Follow us:

UW Election Eye 2012

Campaign 2012 through the eyes of UW faculty and students

February 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM

The CNN Republican presidential debate: Sometimes the presidential candidates do play nice

CNN debate with Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich

Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, and Newt Gingrich participate in the CNN Arizona debate on February 22, 2012. (Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Something was different about last night’s Republican presidential CNN debate.

That is, besides the compacted stage set-up with candidates seated in low, spiny chairs, which produced close moments of tense conversation that were awkward in their intimacy.

Amid the usual debate crosstalk, there was a lot of politeness and agreement on stage last night.

During a back-and-forth about earmarks, Mitt Romney apologized to Rick Santorum, saying, “I’m sorry. I don’t mean to be critical.” Later on in the earmark discussion Santorum called Ron Paul, “One of the most prolific earmarkers in the Congress today,” but quickly followed it up with, “And I’m not — I’m not criticizing.”

Later in the debate when the questioning turned to contraception, while Romney was talking, Santorum looked more like a Yes-Man bobble head than an opponent as he steadily nodding in agreement with Romney. (Go to the 44:45 mark to see the bobble in action.)

And when Romney concluded his comment on the issue of contraception and health care in Massachusetts, the camera zoomed out and Newt Gingrich, in what seemed like an absolute moment of sincerity, said “Nice job.” (Check out the 51:00 mark for this exchange.)

However, after a night of closeness – both physically and on some of the issues – things look different in the light of day. Now members of Santorum’s camp are saying that there is a “tag-team strategy between Ron Paul and Mitt Romney.”

Without a stage and cameras to bring them together, it looks like the pleasantries of last night are in the past.

Comments | Topics: CNN debate, contraception, Debate

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►