Follow us:

UW Election Eye 2012

Campaign 2012 through the eyes of UW faculty and students

June 28, 2012 at 10:48 AM

Will conservatives come after John Roberts? UPDATED

Update at 1:01 pm

And Brent Bozell, conservative firebrand, goes after John Roberts here. Money quote: “People are already talking about the idea that he could be replaced as Chief  Justice.”

———–

Original post

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts stunned many people today–including me–by siding with liberals to uphold the individual mandate in the Obama administration’s health care law. And now he is going to pay a price. Maybe.

First out of the gate: someone vandalized the wikipedia page of Roberts:

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’ Wikipedia page caption appeared to have been changed to “17th Chief Traitor of the United States” soon after the decision on President Obama’s heath care law was announced. Roberts voted with the majority in upholding the mandate. It has since been corrected.

But wait, here’s a counterview from conservative website Redstate editor Erick Erickson, who also is a commentator on CNN. His bottom line: “It seems very, very clear to me in reviewing John Roberts’ decision that he is playing a much longer game than us and can afford to with a life tenure.  And he probably just handed Mitt Romney the White House.”

I think Erickson is right that Roberts has a bigger vision than some might see today. But I think the political impact of this ruling is way overblown. However it came down today would not be the deciding moment of this election. Too many other things are also in play–starting with the economy, but also including immigration, same-sex marriage, and foreign policy.

Here in Washington, though, Rob McKenna just got handed a political bomb. His support for the law’s repeal in a state that on balance supports Obama is a tricky one.

Comments | More in Culture | Topics: health care, John Roberts, Mitt Romney

COMMENTS

No personal attacks or insults, no hate speech, no profanity. Please keep the conversation civil and help us moderate this thread by reporting any abuse. See our Commenting FAQ.



The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.


The Seattle Times

The door is closed, but it's not locked.

Take a minute to subscribe and continue to enjoy The Seattle Times for as little as 99 cents a week.

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Subscriber login ►
The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription upgrade.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. For unlimited seattletimes.com access, please upgrade your digital subscription.

Call customer service at 1.800.542.0820 for assistance with your upgrade or questions about your subscriber status.

The Seattle Times

To keep reading, you need a subscription.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access. Subscribe now for unlimited access!

Subscription options ►

Already a subscriber?

We've got good news for you. Unlimited seattletimes.com content access is included with most subscriptions.

Activate Subscriber Account ►